https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40169 A second writ petition under Article 226 challenging the same service matter was held not maintainable after an earlier petition had been dismissed in limine for failure to exhaust the statutory remedy before the U.P. Public Services Tribunal. The Court applied the principle that an adequate and efficacious alternative statutory forum should ordinarily be pursued before invoking writ jurisdiction, and that entertaining a later petition on the same subject would undermine judicial discipline and finality. The impugned order allowing the second petition was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed, leaving the respondent free to pursue the tribunal remedy if otherwise available in law. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40169 A second writ petition under Article 226 challenging the same service matter was held not maintainable after an earlier petition had been dismissed in limine for failure to exhaust the statutory remedy before the U.P. Public Services Tribunal. The Court applied the principle that an adequate and efficacious alternative statutory forum should ordinarily be pursued before invoking writ jurisdiction, and that entertaining a later petition on the same subject would undermine judicial discipline and finality. The impugned order allowing the second petition was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed, leaving the respondent free to pursue the tribunal remedy if otherwise available in law. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 09 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40169