<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1216 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459996</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC quashed a resolution plan approval due to inadequate notice to a suspended director, violating natural justice principles. The court found the Resolution Professional failed to provide mandatory 5-day notice (reducible to 24 hours with written justification) for an amended resolution plan meeting. Despite respondents claiming it was merely an adjourned meeting, the approved party admitted submitting an amended plan, creating a contradiction. The court held suspended directors have statutory rights to participate in Committee of Creditors meetings per Supreme Court precedent. The matter was remanded to the Committee of Creditors to restart deliberations from the previous valid meeting stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:56:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1216 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459996</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC quashed a resolution plan approval due to inadequate notice to a suspended director, violating natural justice principles. The court found the Resolution Professional failed to provide mandatory 5-day notice (reducible to 24 hours with written justification) for an amended resolution plan meeting. Despite respondents claiming it was merely an adjourned meeting, the approved party admitted submitting an amended plan, creating a contradiction. The court held suspended directors have statutory rights to participate in Committee of Creditors meetings per Supreme Court precedent. The matter was remanded to the Committee of Creditors to restart deliberations from the previous valid meeting stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>