https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459981 The court dismissed the appeals, ruling that setting a benchmark for selection after the recruitment process began was a permissible exercise of discretion and did not constitute an impermissible change in selection criteria. The court reasoned that the benchmark served as a legitimate shortlisting tool to ensure the selection of the most qualified candidates and did not alter the fundamental criteria established at the outset. The decision upheld the employer's prerogative to maintain high standards in recruitment, particularly in cases with a large number of applicants. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jan 2025 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459981 The court dismissed the appeals, ruling that setting a benchmark for selection after the recruitment process began was a permissible exercise of discretion and did not constitute an impermissible change in selection criteria. The court reasoned that the benchmark served as a legitimate shortlisting tool to ensure the selection of the most qualified candidates and did not alter the fundamental criteria established at the outset. The decision upheld the employer's prerogative to maintain high standards in recruitment, particularly in cases with a large number of applicants. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459981