https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40141 The Supreme Court applied stare decisis and held that the question raised was squarely covered by its earlier decision in Ahmed Ibrahim Sahigra Dhoraji v. CWT, which had approved the Allahabad High Court judgment. Treating that ruling as binding precedent, the Court declined to revisit the settled point and dismissed the appeals. No order as to costs. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:21:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40141 The Supreme Court applied stare decisis and held that the question raised was squarely covered by its earlier decision in Ahmed Ibrahim Sahigra Dhoraji v. CWT, which had approved the Allahabad High Court judgment. Treating that ruling as binding precedent, the Court declined to revisit the settled point and dismissed the appeals. No order as to costs. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40141