<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 308 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764246</link>
    <description>Interest was not payable on Cenvat credit alleged to have been wrongly availed where the amount remained in a separate account and was neither transferred into the Cenvat account nor used to discharge service tax liability. Mere retention of the amount did not constitute availment for the purpose of attracting interest; liability to interest arose only upon transfer and utilisation of the credit. The demand of interest was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 12:49:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 308 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764246</link>
      <description>Interest was not payable on Cenvat credit alleged to have been wrongly availed where the amount remained in a separate account and was neither transferred into the Cenvat account nor used to discharge service tax liability. Mere retention of the amount did not constitute availment for the purpose of attracting interest; liability to interest arose only upon transfer and utilisation of the credit. The demand of interest was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>