<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1509 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459970</link>
    <description>The ITAT Surat-AT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding a revision under section 263 concerning a gift received from grandmother. The PCIT challenged the AO&#039;s acceptance of the gift without adequate inquiry under section 68, arguing it should have been taxed as unexplained cash credit under section 115BBE. The tribunal distinguished between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry, finding the AO had conducted some inquiry by examining affidavits, gift deed, bank statements, and other documents. Since the assessee provided substantial documentation including banking channel evidence and the AO took a possible view, the PCIT&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 07:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1509 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459970</link>
      <description>The ITAT Surat-AT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding a revision under section 263 concerning a gift received from grandmother. The PCIT challenged the AO&#039;s acceptance of the gift without adequate inquiry under section 68, arguing it should have been taxed as unexplained cash credit under section 115BBE. The tribunal distinguished between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry, finding the AO had conducted some inquiry by examining affidavits, gift deed, bank statements, and other documents. Since the assessee provided substantial documentation including banking channel evidence and the AO took a possible view, the PCIT&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>