<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC junks cheating case against Goa MLA over property fraud</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=29589</link>
    <description>The FIR alleging fraudulent sale of jointly owned land was quashed as an abuse of criminal process because the dispute was primarily civil, civil suits asserting co-ownership predated the complaint, no evidence showed deception or loss by the appellant, and the delayed filing without disclosing pending litigation justified setting aside the FIR only as against the appellant while leaving civil merits undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 20:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 20:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC junks cheating case against Goa MLA over property fraud</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=29589</link>
      <description>The FIR alleging fraudulent sale of jointly owned land was quashed as an abuse of criminal process because the dispute was primarily civil, civil suits asserting co-ownership predated the complaint, no evidence showed deception or loss by the appellant, and the delayed filing without disclosing pending litigation justified setting aside the FIR only as against the appellant while leaving civil merits undecided.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 20:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=29589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>