<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 620 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459955</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution under the Income-tax Act cannot be sustained where the complaint and cognizance are founded on an assessment that has been annulled in appeal and remitted for fresh assessment, with no subsequent assessment shown to have been completed. On those facts, continuation of proceedings on the basis of the set-aside assessment was held unsustainable, and the prosecution as well as the cognizance order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 620 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459955</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution under the Income-tax Act cannot be sustained where the complaint and cognizance are founded on an assessment that has been annulled in appeal and remitted for fresh assessment, with no subsequent assessment shown to have been completed. On those facts, continuation of proceedings on the basis of the set-aside assessment was held unsustainable, and the prosecution as well as the cognizance order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>