https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459951 A foreign arbitral award could be enforced in India without first obtaining a separate confirmation decree from a United States court, because the post-New York Convention framework rejects any double exequatur requirement. The consent order stated that the award was final and binding, and the objecting party had not taken the steps contemplated to challenge enforcement in the foreign jurisdiction. The objection that the award was not binding was therefore untenable, and enforcement in India was upheld. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2025 15:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459951 A foreign arbitral award could be enforced in India without first obtaining a separate confirmation decree from a United States court, because the post-New York Convention framework rejects any double exequatur requirement. The consent order stated that the award was final and binding, and the objecting party had not taken the steps contemplated to challenge enforcement in the foreign jurisdiction. The objection that the award was not binding was therefore untenable, and enforcement in India was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459951