<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40124</link>
    <description>For central excise valuation, the normal wholesale price charged by the assessee is the assessable value under section 4(1)(a) unless the buyer is proved to be a related person and the price is not the sole consideration. The definition of related person in section 4(4)(c) requires mutual, direct or indirect commercial interest in each other&#039;s business. The text states that resale by the buyer at a higher price, or suspicion of tax avoidance, cannot displace the assessee&#039;s price without supporting factual findings. On the facts described, the assessee&#039;s price to Bush India Ltd. was treated as the assessable value and the excise notices were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40124</link>
      <description>For central excise valuation, the normal wholesale price charged by the assessee is the assessable value under section 4(1)(a) unless the buyer is proved to be a related person and the price is not the sole consideration. The definition of related person in section 4(4)(c) requires mutual, direct or indirect commercial interest in each other&#039;s business. The text states that resale by the buyer at a higher price, or suspicion of tax avoidance, cannot displace the assessee&#039;s price without supporting factual findings. On the facts described, the assessee&#039;s price to Bush India Ltd. was treated as the assessable value and the excise notices were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>