<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Confirms MCPCBs Classified as Standard PCBs, Rejects Revenue Appeal on LED Lamp Parts Classification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84605</link>
    <description>MCPCBs should be classified under CTH 8534 as standard PCBs, not under CTH 94054090 as parts of LED lamps. CESTAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that MCPCBs cannot be classified differently from Tribunal&#039;s view on identical facts that they merit classification under Tariff Item 8534 0000. Department cannot rely on IGST Notification to determine classification under Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Confirms MCPCBs Classified as Standard PCBs, Rejects Revenue Appeal on LED Lamp Parts Classification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84605</link>
      <description>MCPCBs should be classified under CTH 8534 as standard PCBs, not under CTH 94054090 as parts of LED lamps. CESTAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that MCPCBs cannot be classified differently from Tribunal&#039;s view on identical facts that they merit classification under Tariff Item 8534 0000. Department cannot rely on IGST Notification to determine classification under Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>