https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764197 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to disturb a reasoned arbitral order absent demonstrable perversity, particularly where the party had already been given sufficient opportunity to cross-examine. The arbitral record showed cross-examination on multiple dates for extended periods, and the Tribunal found that further time was unwarranted. Although Section 18 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires equal treatment and full opportunity to present the case, judicial interference in arbitral proceedings must remain restrained and exceptional. The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's refusal to grant further time, and set aside the High Court's direction granting an additional opportunity. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764197 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to disturb a reasoned arbitral order absent demonstrable perversity, particularly where the party had already been given sufficient opportunity to cross-examine. The arbitral record showed cross-examination on multiple dates for extended periods, and the Tribunal found that further time was unwarranted. Although Section 18 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires equal treatment and full opportunity to present the case, judicial interference in arbitral proceedings must remain restrained and exceptional. The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's refusal to grant further time, and set aside the High Court's direction granting an additional opportunity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764197