https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764198 For filing objections to an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, limitation begins when parties receive sufficient intimation that the award has been filed and is available, not only on service of a formal notice. Section 14(2) requires notice of filing, and Article 119(b) of the Limitation Act, 1963 links limitation to service of that notice, but the form of notice is not decisive. An earlier order directing payment of the arbitrator's balance fees and stating that the award would then be furnished was held to be adequate notice because it conveyed filing and availability of the award. Formal notice later served was unnecessary, and the objection application was time-barred. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764198 For filing objections to an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, limitation begins when parties receive sufficient intimation that the award has been filed and is available, not only on service of a formal notice. Section 14(2) requires notice of filing, and Article 119(b) of the Limitation Act, 1963 links limitation to service of that notice, but the form of notice is not decisive. An earlier order directing payment of the arbitrator's balance fees and stating that the award would then be furnished was held to be adequate notice because it conveyed filing and availability of the award. Formal notice later served was unnecessary, and the objection application was time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764198