https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764199 The writ court's interference with a pre-deposit direction was held to be unavailable on these facts. The court treated the mandatory pre-deposit requirement as a statutory condition for entertaining the appeal and noted that writ jurisdiction to bypass it is confined to exceptional cases involving gross injustice or palpable illegality. Finding no sufficient basis for such exceptional intervention, the court declined to disturb the appellate order and rejected the challenge. It also disagreed with the contrary view of another High Court on waiver of pre-deposit in similar circumstances. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764199 The writ court's interference with a pre-deposit direction was held to be unavailable on these facts. The court treated the mandatory pre-deposit requirement as a statutory condition for entertaining the appeal and noted that writ jurisdiction to bypass it is confined to exceptional cases involving gross injustice or palpable illegality. Finding no sufficient basis for such exceptional intervention, the court declined to disturb the appellate order and rejected the challenge. It also disagreed with the contrary view of another High Court on waiver of pre-deposit in similar circumstances. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764199