https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40116 The Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1961 was upheld against constitutional challenge because the subject-matter fell within the concurrent field and no repugnancy with Central law was shown. The inclusion of sugar, khandsari, shakkar and gur in the schedule was also sustained because the Act used an inclusive definition of agricultural produce and authorised the State Government to amend the schedule. The Court accepted that agricultural produce may extend beyond items grown directly from soil and may cover processed or manufactured commodities where the statute so provides. Objections based on excessive delegation, arbitrariness, fundamental rights and absence of quid pro quo were rejected. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40116 The Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1961 was upheld against constitutional challenge because the subject-matter fell within the concurrent field and no repugnancy with Central law was shown. The inclusion of sugar, khandsari, shakkar and gur in the schedule was also sustained because the Act used an inclusive definition of agricultural produce and authorised the State Government to amend the schedule. The Court accepted that agricultural produce may extend beyond items grown directly from soil and may cover processed or manufactured commodities where the statute so provides. Objections based on excessive delegation, arbitrariness, fundamental rights and absence of quid pro quo were rejected. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 23 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40116