https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764209 The HC dismissed the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to release detained containers, as the responsibility to clear the cargo lies with the consignees, not the petitioner. The court also denied the petitioner's plea to restrain the respondents from charging fees related to ground rent, storage, and handling, since the petitioner could recover these charges from the consignees. No additional reliefs or costs were awarded to the petitioner, as the court found no merit in the claims presented. The court emphasized that intermediaries are not entitled to extraordinary reliefs when statutory obligations fall on other parties. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764209 The HC dismissed the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to release detained containers, as the responsibility to clear the cargo lies with the consignees, not the petitioner. The court also denied the petitioner's plea to restrain the respondents from charging fees related to ground rent, storage, and handling, since the petitioner could recover these charges from the consignees. No additional reliefs or costs were awarded to the petitioner, as the court found no merit in the claims presented. The court emphasized that intermediaries are not entitled to extraordinary reliefs when statutory obligations fall on other parties. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764209