https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764238 The court upheld the validity of the relaxation of eligibility criteria for appointing a Technical Member (State) to the GSTAT in Himachal Pradesh under the proviso of Section 110(1)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. It determined that the decision by the GST Council and the GST Implementation Committee was legally binding and enforceable, as it adhered to statutory procedures. The relaxation was deemed to broaden the candidate pool without compromising the appointment process's integrity, ensuring that officers with 25 years of government service, rather than just Group A service, could be considered. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:42:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764238 The court upheld the validity of the relaxation of eligibility criteria for appointing a Technical Member (State) to the GSTAT in Himachal Pradesh under the proviso of Section 110(1)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. It determined that the decision by the GST Council and the GST Implementation Committee was legally binding and enforceable, as it adhered to statutory procedures. The relaxation was deemed to broaden the candidate pool without compromising the appointment process's integrity, ensuring that officers with 25 years of government service, rather than just Group A service, could be considered. Case-Laws GST Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764238