<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40112</link>
    <description>Bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, mercerising and similar treatment of grey fabric was treated as manufacture because the processed fabric emerged with a distinct commercial identity, character and price structure. The 1980 amendment enlarging the definition of manufacture and the excise levy was sustained as within legislative competence under the excise entry, and alternatively under the residuary power. The additional duty regime was also held workable by reading the special duties statute with the central excise framework. Retrospective validation was not found to violate the freedom to trade. Assessable value had to include grey cloth value, processing charges, manufacturing profit and expenses, but not post-manufacturing trading profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 122 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40112</link>
      <description>Bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, mercerising and similar treatment of grey fabric was treated as manufacture because the processed fabric emerged with a distinct commercial identity, character and price structure. The 1980 amendment enlarging the definition of manufacture and the excise levy was sustained as within legislative competence under the excise entry, and alternatively under the residuary power. The additional duty regime was also held workable by reading the special duties statute with the central excise framework. Retrospective validation was not found to violate the freedom to trade. Assessable value had to include grey cloth value, processing charges, manufacturing profit and expenses, but not post-manufacturing trading profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>