<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1915 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459944</link>
    <description>Bombay HC held that the respondent company was liable to repay Rs. 10,00,000 to the petitioner as a loan, rejecting the company&#039;s claim that it was paid as demurrage charges on behalf of another entity. The court found no evidence in the company&#039;s books of accounts supporting the demurrage claim, and the company failed to establish a bona fide dispute regarding the debt. The court noted the company&#039;s reluctance to produce complete financial records and inability to demonstrate that amounts were received on behalf of the third party. The respondent company was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 14:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1915 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459944</link>
      <description>Bombay HC held that the respondent company was liable to repay Rs. 10,00,000 to the petitioner as a loan, rejecting the company&#039;s claim that it was paid as demurrage charges on behalf of another entity. The court found no evidence in the company&#039;s books of accounts supporting the demurrage claim, and the company failed to establish a bona fide dispute regarding the debt. The court noted the company&#039;s reluctance to produce complete financial records and inability to demonstrate that amounts were received on behalf of the third party. The respondent company was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>