<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unreasoned refusal of adjournment for contentious hearings quashed by HC; procedural fairness upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84588</link>
    <description>HC quashed impugned order dated 16 August 2024 passed by Assistant Commissioner u/s 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Assistant Commissioner took narrow, pedantic view in refusing adjournment without assigning reasons, despite contestation regarding petitioner&#039;s participation in hearings. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unreasoned refusal of adjournment for contentious hearings quashed by HC; procedural fairness upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84588</link>
      <description>HC quashed impugned order dated 16 August 2024 passed by Assistant Commissioner u/s 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Assistant Commissioner took narrow, pedantic view in refusing adjournment without assigning reasons, despite contestation regarding petitioner&#039;s participation in hearings. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>