<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 247 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764185</link>
    <description>The SC disposed of the Special Leave Petitions by applying its earlier decision on the same issue, directing that the matters be examined by the assessing officers in accordance with that ruling. The connected petitioner was left to seek appropriate relief upon verification of the stated factual position. The operative effect is that the prior precedent governs the pending matters, while any further relief depends on factual verification by the relevant authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 247 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764185</link>
      <description>The SC disposed of the Special Leave Petitions by applying its earlier decision on the same issue, directing that the matters be examined by the assessing officers in accordance with that ruling. The connected petitioner was left to seek appropriate relief upon verification of the stated factual position. The operative effect is that the prior precedent governs the pending matters, while any further relief depends on factual verification by the relevant authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>