<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 250 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764188</link>
    <description>Challenge to an appellate order concerning short payment of GST was addressed by relying on an earlier Division Bench view that required a deposit amount while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the statutory remedy once the Tribunal is constituted. If the petitioner does not avail that remedy within the time available after reconstitution, the department may proceed in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 250 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764188</link>
      <description>Challenge to an appellate order concerning short payment of GST was addressed by relying on an earlier Division Bench view that required a deposit amount while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the statutory remedy once the Tribunal is constituted. If the petitioner does not avail that remedy within the time available after reconstitution, the department may proceed in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>