<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 256 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764194</link>
    <description>Suspension of GST registration pending enquiry was treated as unduly harsh where the registered dealer had already replied to the show cause notice. The authority was required to consider the reply before taking a final decision in accordance with law, and the suspension was ordered to be revoked forthwith. The authority was left free to pass a fresh order on the pending cancellation matter after due consideration of the reply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 256 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764194</link>
      <description>Suspension of GST registration pending enquiry was treated as unduly harsh where the registered dealer had already replied to the show cause notice. The authority was required to consider the reply before taking a final decision in accordance with law, and the suspension was ordered to be revoked forthwith. The authority was left free to pass a fresh order on the pending cancellation matter after due consideration of the reply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>