https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459926 Pendency of a matter before the Supreme Court does not, by itself, prevent other Tribunals or Courts from deciding similar cases unless the Court has specifically directed otherwise. The Court also disapproved casting aspersions on CESTAT or any other Tribunal for deciding matters finally while a related issue is pending before it. The operative principle is that judicial discipline is not breached merely because similar litigation is awaiting consideration in the Supreme Court, absent an express restraint order. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jan 2025 20:22:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459926 Pendency of a matter before the Supreme Court does not, by itself, prevent other Tribunals or Courts from deciding similar cases unless the Court has specifically directed otherwise. The Court also disapproved casting aspersions on CESTAT or any other Tribunal for deciding matters finally while a related issue is pending before it. The operative principle is that judicial discipline is not breached merely because similar litigation is awaiting consideration in the Supreme Court, absent an express restraint order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459926