<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40078</link>
    <description>Under the Excess Profits Tax Act, deficiency of profits can be set off only if it arises in the relevant accounting period as computed on the annual income-tax basis. Profits and losses are determined by the accounting period, not by a notional split between manufacturing and sale across different periods. Where no profit is computed in that accounting period, no separate profit can be attributed merely because manufacturing occurred earlier. On that basis, carry-forward set-off based on apportionment across periods was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40078</link>
      <description>Under the Excess Profits Tax Act, deficiency of profits can be set off only if it arises in the relevant accounting period as computed on the annual income-tax basis. Profits and losses are determined by the accounting period, not by a notional split between manufacturing and sale across different periods. Where no profit is computed in that accounting period, no separate profit can be attributed merely because manufacturing occurred earlier. On that basis, carry-forward set-off based on apportionment across periods was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>