<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40065</link>
    <description>A notional partition under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act serves only to ascertain the deceased coparcener&#039;s share and the heirs&#039; entitlement; it does not, by itself, sever a female heir from the joint family or make her a separate member without voluntary separation. The Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act treats the family as the relevant ceiling unit, and the proviso to section 6 does not create a general rule for separate ceiling units for heirs holding inherited shares. The family therefore remained entitled to only one ceiling unit, and surplus land was to be determined on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40065</link>
      <description>A notional partition under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act serves only to ascertain the deceased coparcener&#039;s share and the heirs&#039; entitlement; it does not, by itself, sever a female heir from the joint family or make her a separate member without voluntary separation. The Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act treats the family as the relevant ceiling unit, and the proviso to section 6 does not create a general rule for separate ceiling units for heirs holding inherited shares. The family therefore remained entitled to only one ceiling unit, and surplus land was to be determined on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>