<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 152 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764090</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time and subsequent developments. The Court agreed with the petitioner on a prima facie basis but emphasized that the impugned judgment would not serve as a precedent. The question of law remains open, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 152 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764090</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time and subsequent developments. The Court agreed with the petitioner on a prima facie basis but emphasized that the impugned judgment would not serve as a precedent. The question of law remains open, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>