<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764098</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore held that severance fee received as compensation on voluntary retirement under Compulsory Retirement Scheme constitutes income receipt, not capital receipt. The tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision that severance compensation paid upon employment termination falls within &quot;Profit received in lieu of Salary&quot; under section 17(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, making it taxable under the head &quot;Salary&quot; rather than being exempt as capital receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764098</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore held that severance fee received as compensation on voluntary retirement under Compulsory Retirement Scheme constitutes income receipt, not capital receipt. The tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision that severance compensation paid upon employment termination falls within &quot;Profit received in lieu of Salary&quot; under section 17(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, making it taxable under the head &quot;Salary&quot; rather than being exempt as capital receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>