<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764114</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that notice under section 148 issued on 27/07/2022 was barred by limitation as the six-year period had expired on 31/03/2022. The tribunal applied the test that validity of section 148 notices depends on whether six years had expired at the time of issuance, regardless of whether new or prior regime applies. Consequently, the assessment proceedings under section 147 were quashed on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764114</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that notice under section 148 issued on 27/07/2022 was barred by limitation as the six-year period had expired on 31/03/2022. The tribunal applied the test that validity of section 148 notices depends on whether six years had expired at the time of issuance, regardless of whether new or prior regime applies. Consequently, the assessment proceedings under section 147 were quashed on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>