<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 186 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764124</link>
    <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s direction to CIT(E) to grant registration u/s 12AA to the assessee society. CIT(E) had rejected registration claiming the trust&#039;s activities constituted trade, commerce or business under proviso to Section 2(15). The HC found that the society&#039;s activities were genuinely charitable for public benefit, not commercial in nature. The court emphasized that the Commissioner must satisfy himself about the trust&#039;s objects and genuineness of activities before registration. The CIT(E)&#039;s finding that activities were commercial was held incorrect, and the ITAT&#039;s order directing registration was upheld as lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 186 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764124</link>
      <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s direction to CIT(E) to grant registration u/s 12AA to the assessee society. CIT(E) had rejected registration claiming the trust&#039;s activities constituted trade, commerce or business under proviso to Section 2(15). The HC found that the society&#039;s activities were genuinely charitable for public benefit, not commercial in nature. The court emphasized that the Commissioner must satisfy himself about the trust&#039;s objects and genuineness of activities before registration. The CIT(E)&#039;s finding that activities were commercial was held incorrect, and the ITAT&#039;s order directing registration was upheld as lawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>