<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 191 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764129</link>
    <description>The Telangana HC set aside the cancellation of petitioner&#039;s registration, finding the show cause notice lacked proper reasoning and violated natural justice principles. The court relied on M/S. NICE ENTERPRISES precedent, which established that inadequately reasoned notices prevent assessees from filing effective replies, contravening natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and petition disposed of favorably for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 191 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764129</link>
      <description>The Telangana HC set aside the cancellation of petitioner&#039;s registration, finding the show cause notice lacked proper reasoning and violated natural justice principles. The court relied on M/S. NICE ENTERPRISES precedent, which established that inadequately reasoned notices prevent assessees from filing effective replies, contravening natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and petition disposed of favorably for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>