<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 85 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40058</link>
    <description>Remission of interest previously allowed as a deduction under the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act did not itself constitute agricultural income when the creditor later waived the liability and the amount was credited in the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Supreme Court held that a mere remission is not a receipt arising from agricultural operations and, in the absence of a statutory deeming fiction, cannot be taxed as agricultural income. The assessee&#039;s mercantile method of accounting did not change the character of the waived sum. The remission amount was therefore not assessable to agricultural income-tax, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 85 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40058</link>
      <description>Remission of interest previously allowed as a deduction under the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act did not itself constitute agricultural income when the creditor later waived the liability and the amount was credited in the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Supreme Court held that a mere remission is not a receipt arising from agricultural operations and, in the absence of a statutory deeming fiction, cannot be taxed as agricultural income. The assessee&#039;s mercantile method of accounting did not change the character of the waived sum. The remission amount was therefore not assessable to agricultural income-tax, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>