<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764151</link>
    <description>HC directed petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within two weeks of receiving the order. The impugned assessment order is treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner must file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt. Finding that neither the show cause notices nor the assessment order were properly served, the court disposed of the petition on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764151</link>
      <description>HC directed petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within two weeks of receiving the order. The impugned assessment order is treated as a show cause notice; the petitioner must file objections with supporting documents within four weeks of receipt. Finding that neither the show cause notices nor the assessment order were properly served, the court disposed of the petition on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>