<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459900</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and related economic offences was refused where the applicant&#039;s admitted past directorship, continuing shareholding, asserted access to company records, and alleged role in diversion of investor funds connected her to the transaction. The Court treated the seriousness and gravity of the allegations, the scale of the funds involved, the addition of further offences during investigation, multiple pending criminal cases, the non-bailable warrant and reward, and the applicant&#039;s stated non-cooperation with the investigating agency as material against pre-arrest protection. It reiterated that anticipatory bail is not confined to exceptional cases or dependent on a special case being shown, but held that the facts on record did not justify grant of such relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 23:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459900</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and related economic offences was refused where the applicant&#039;s admitted past directorship, continuing shareholding, asserted access to company records, and alleged role in diversion of investor funds connected her to the transaction. The Court treated the seriousness and gravity of the allegations, the scale of the funds involved, the addition of further offences during investigation, multiple pending criminal cases, the non-bailable warrant and reward, and the applicant&#039;s stated non-cooperation with the investigating agency as material against pre-arrest protection. It reiterated that anticipatory bail is not confined to exceptional cases or dependent on a special case being shown, but held that the facts on record did not justify grant of such relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>