<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459902</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a Punjab-based medical institute seeking renewal permission for 150 MBBS seats for 2024-25. The petitioner argued jurisdiction existed because the National Medical Commission&#039;s head office was located in Delhi. However, the HC applied the doctrine of forum conveniens, ruling that merely having a respondent&#039;s office within territorial jurisdiction is insufficient grounds for entertaining the petition. The court emphasized that a substantial part of the cause of action must arise within the jurisdiction, not just a small portion. Since the institute was situated in Punjab, affiliated with a Punjab university, and under Punjab state control, the HC concluded it was not the appropriate forum and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 23:38:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1580 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459902</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a Punjab-based medical institute seeking renewal permission for 150 MBBS seats for 2024-25. The petitioner argued jurisdiction existed because the National Medical Commission&#039;s head office was located in Delhi. However, the HC applied the doctrine of forum conveniens, ruling that merely having a respondent&#039;s office within territorial jurisdiction is insufficient grounds for entertaining the petition. The court emphasized that a substantial part of the cause of action must arise within the jurisdiction, not just a small portion. Since the institute was situated in Punjab, affiliated with a Punjab university, and under Punjab state control, the HC concluded it was not the appropriate forum and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>