<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1646 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459913</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80P was held allowable on interest earned from deposits with nationalised banks, as the Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and followed earlier decisions granting the deduction. It preferred the Karnataka High Court view over the contrary Delhi High Court view where no jurisdictional High Court ruling was shown to exist. The denial of deduction was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 23:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1646 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459913</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80P was held allowable on interest earned from deposits with nationalised banks, as the Tribunal treated the issue as no longer res integra and followed earlier decisions granting the deduction. It preferred the Karnataka High Court view over the contrary Delhi High Court view where no jurisdictional High Court ruling was shown to exist. The denial of deduction was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>