<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1824 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459894</link>
    <description>The HC admitted the winding-up petition for Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt. Ltd., determining that the company had lost its substratum following the SC&#039;s quashing of its 2G licenses, rendering it unable to continue its principal business. The court found a deadlock and irretrievable breakdown in relations between the principal shareholders, justifying the winding-up. Allegations of improper motives and mismanagement by the petitioner were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The petition was deemed maintainable under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, despite the absence of a statutory notice, due to the company&#039;s evident insolvency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:05:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1824 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459894</link>
      <description>The HC admitted the winding-up petition for Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt. Ltd., determining that the company had lost its substratum following the SC&#039;s quashing of its 2G licenses, rendering it unable to continue its principal business. The court found a deadlock and irretrievable breakdown in relations between the principal shareholders, justifying the winding-up. Allegations of improper motives and mismanagement by the petitioner were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The petition was deemed maintainable under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, despite the absence of a statutory notice, due to the company&#039;s evident insolvency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>