https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13281 The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 197(1) CrPC is required for complaints under Section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA where (i) the accused is a public servant removable only by or with government sanction, and (ii) the alleged money laundering acts are shown to have been committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duties; CrPC provisions applied to the PMLA by Section 65 continue to operate despite the PMLA's overriding clause. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2025 13:55:01 +0530 Thu, 02 Jan 2025 13:55:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13281 The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 197(1) CrPC is required for complaints under Section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA where (i) the accused is a public servant removable only by or with government sanction, and (ii) the alleged money laundering acts are shown to have been committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duties; CrPC provisions applied to the PMLA by Section 65 continue to operate despite the PMLA's overriding clause. Articles Other Topics Thu, 02 Jan 2025 13:55:01 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13281