<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40043</link>
    <description>A Supreme Court declaration upholding the validity of entry tax legislation binds all affected parties under Article 141 when multiple writ petitions were decided by a common judgment on identical grounds. The Court treated earlier observations about the absence of appeals by all petitioners as obiter and not limiting the binding force of the later declaration of law. Once the statute was held constitutionally valid, the High Court&#039;s mandamus restraining enforcement lost its foundation and could no longer be sustained or enforced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40043</link>
      <description>A Supreme Court declaration upholding the validity of entry tax legislation binds all affected parties under Article 141 when multiple writ petitions were decided by a common judgment on identical grounds. The Court treated earlier observations about the absence of appeals by all petitioners as obiter and not limiting the binding force of the later declaration of law. Once the statute was held constitutionally valid, the High Court&#039;s mandamus restraining enforcement lost its foundation and could no longer be sustained or enforced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>