<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40037</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court criticized the grant of interim relief without hearing the opposite parties, emphasized the importance of jurisdiction in filing writ petitions, discussed the transfer of a similar case, and addressed a contempt of court application regarding the disposal of applications promptly. The judgment highlights the need for caution in granting interim relief against statutory orders and the consequences of delaying proceedings in distant High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40037</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court criticized the grant of interim relief without hearing the opposite parties, emphasized the importance of jurisdiction in filing writ petitions, discussed the transfer of a similar case, and addressed a contempt of court application regarding the disposal of applications promptly. The judgment highlights the need for caution in granting interim relief against statutory orders and the consequences of delaying proceedings in distant High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>