https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459889 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue a concluded matter because additional authorities were not cited earlier; no such manifest error was shown, so recall was refused. Statutory attachment of a notified party's property under the Special Court Act did not extinguish existing tenant rights or oust the forum competent to decide landlord-tenant disputes; eviction of occupants from attached property had to be worked out before the Rent Court. The earlier order was therefore left undisturbed, and the review failed for lack of legal basis. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:02:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459889 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue a concluded matter because additional authorities were not cited earlier; no such manifest error was shown, so recall was refused. Statutory attachment of a notified party's property under the Special Court Act did not extinguish existing tenant rights or oust the forum competent to decide landlord-tenant disputes; eviction of occupants from attached property had to be worked out before the Rent Court. The earlier order was therefore left undisturbed, and the review failed for lack of legal basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459889