<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1281 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459890</link>
    <description>In a writ challenge involving orders passed by a State Government and a revisional authority, the Delhi HC held that the mere situs of the revisional authority was not enough to establish maintainable territorial jurisdiction. The court applied the principles of territorial nexus and forum conveniens, noting that the principal order arose from Maharashtra, the dispute related to mineral concession proceedings there, and most affected applicants were outside Delhi. To avoid conflicting decisions and forum shopping, the petition was declined in Delhi, and the petitioner was left to approach the High Court with the more direct territorial connection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1281 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459890</link>
      <description>In a writ challenge involving orders passed by a State Government and a revisional authority, the Delhi HC held that the mere situs of the revisional authority was not enough to establish maintainable territorial jurisdiction. The court applied the principles of territorial nexus and forum conveniens, noting that the principal order arose from Maharashtra, the dispute related to mineral concession proceedings there, and most affected applicants were outside Delhi. To avoid conflicting decisions and forum shopping, the petition was declined in Delhi, and the petitioner was left to approach the High Court with the more direct territorial connection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>