<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Tribunal Allows Conversion of EOU Shipping Bills, Cites Lack of Natural Justice in Rejection.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84496</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision rejecting conversion of EOU shipping bills to DBK/DEPB shipping bills. It held the Commissioner&#039;s rejection violated principles of natural justice as no show cause notice or personal hearing was granted. The appellant had paid duty on clearances after de-bonding and closing stock, making them eligible for conversion u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 as exports were from duty-paid inputs despite filing EOU shipping bills due to lack of final NOC. The CESTAT ruled the appellant was legally entitled to conversion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Tribunal Allows Conversion of EOU Shipping Bills, Cites Lack of Natural Justice in Rejection.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84496</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision rejecting conversion of EOU shipping bills to DBK/DEPB shipping bills. It held the Commissioner&#039;s rejection violated principles of natural justice as no show cause notice or personal hearing was granted. The appellant had paid duty on clearances after de-bonding and closing stock, making them eligible for conversion u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 as exports were from duty-paid inputs despite filing EOU shipping bills due to lack of final NOC. The CESTAT ruled the appellant was legally entitled to conversion.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>