<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dishonored Cheque Case Dismissed Due to Failure to Prosecute Company; Only Company Can Be Primary Accused.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84488</link>
    <description>The HC held that the non-prosecution of the company from whose account the dishonored cheque was issued is a fatal, non-curable illegality, leading to dismissal of the complaint u/s 138 of the NI Act. The prosecution requires the company to be named as an accused, and directors/officers can only be held vicariously liable if the company is prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dishonored Cheque Case Dismissed Due to Failure to Prosecute Company; Only Company Can Be Primary Accused.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84488</link>
      <description>The HC held that the non-prosecution of the company from whose account the dishonored cheque was issued is a fatal, non-curable illegality, leading to dismissal of the complaint u/s 138 of the NI Act. The prosecution requires the company to be named as an accused, and directors/officers can only be held vicariously liable if the company is prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>