<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accused&#039;s Defense Cannot Be Considered for Quashing Complaint u/s 138 of NI Act: Prove Before Trial Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84484</link>
    <description>The HC held that it cannot assume the role of trial court and consider the accused&#039;s defense while exercising powers u/s 482 CrPC to quash complaint u/s 138 NI Act. The accused is required to prove defense by leading evidence before trial court. The petition being silent on lack of ingredients for Section 138 complaint was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accused&#039;s Defense Cannot Be Considered for Quashing Complaint u/s 138 of NI Act: Prove Before Trial Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84484</link>
      <description>The HC held that it cannot assume the role of trial court and consider the accused&#039;s defense while exercising powers u/s 482 CrPC to quash complaint u/s 138 NI Act. The accused is required to prove defense by leading evidence before trial court. The petition being silent on lack of ingredients for Section 138 complaint was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>