https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763997 A commercial counter-claim arising from the same transaction as the original suit did not require a fresh round of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, because repeated mediation would undermine expeditious disposal and pre-litigation mediation had already been invoked. The court also treated delivery of goods and the counter-claim as proved on a combined reading of e-way bills, GST returns, bank records, witness evidence, and contemporaneous WhatsApp messages, with the absence of rebuttal evidence and timely rejection of e-way bill details supporting the respondent's case. The recovery claim therefore failed. en-us Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 19:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763997 A commercial counter-claim arising from the same transaction as the original suit did not require a fresh round of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, because repeated mediation would undermine expeditious disposal and pre-litigation mediation had already been invoked. The court also treated delivery of goods and the counter-claim as proved on a combined reading of e-way bills, GST returns, bank records, witness evidence, and contemporaneous WhatsApp messages, with the absence of rebuttal evidence and timely rejection of e-way bill details supporting the respondent's case. The recovery claim therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763997