<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764019</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal by dissenting financial creditor challenging CoC&#039;s decision to deduct Rs.34 crores from their payout under approved Resolution Plan. The CoC approved the plan with 70.07% vote share while appellant held 6.64% and voted against. Tribunal held that commercial wisdom of CoC in approving distribution manner is binding on all stakeholders including dissenting creditors, citing Supreme Court precedents. The appellant could not challenge CoC&#039;s decision taken in 31st meeting regarding deduction from their payout as dissenting financial creditors are bound by majority decisions under the Resolution Plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 19:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 81 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764019</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal by dissenting financial creditor challenging CoC&#039;s decision to deduct Rs.34 crores from their payout under approved Resolution Plan. The CoC approved the plan with 70.07% vote share while appellant held 6.64% and voted against. Tribunal held that commercial wisdom of CoC in approving distribution manner is binding on all stakeholders including dissenting creditors, citing Supreme Court precedents. The appellant could not challenge CoC&#039;s decision taken in 31st meeting regarding deduction from their payout as dissenting financial creditors are bound by majority decisions under the Resolution Plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>