<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 93 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764031</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 68 in assessment under section 153A. The tribunal found that the addition was not based on incriminating material found during search but relied on third-party investigation report. Following Supreme Court precedent in Abhisar Buildwell case, ITAT held that additions under section 153A must be supported by incriminating material discovered during search operations. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 93 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764031</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition under section 68 in assessment under section 153A. The tribunal found that the addition was not based on incriminating material found during search but relied on third-party investigation report. Following Supreme Court precedent in Abhisar Buildwell case, ITAT held that additions under section 153A must be supported by incriminating material discovered during search operations. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>