<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 100 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764038</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding bogus purchases and GP rate estimation. The AO applied 12.5% GP rate on purchases, but the tribunal found this unjustified when the assessee provided detailed purchase-sales correspondence, delivery challans, quantities, and banking channel payments with invoices. The addition was based solely on one person&#039;s statement about providing bogus bills, without specifically naming the assessee. Since quantitative purchase-sales details matched trading results and accepted gross profit, with corresponding one-to-one sales shown, no GP rate addition was warranted. The tribunal deleted the entire addition made by AO and partly confirmed by CIT(A). Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 100 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764038</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding bogus purchases and GP rate estimation. The AO applied 12.5% GP rate on purchases, but the tribunal found this unjustified when the assessee provided detailed purchase-sales correspondence, delivery challans, quantities, and banking channel payments with invoices. The addition was based solely on one person&#039;s statement about providing bogus bills, without specifically naming the assessee. Since quantitative purchase-sales details matched trading results and accepted gross profit, with corresponding one-to-one sales shown, no GP rate addition was warranted. The tribunal deleted the entire addition made by AO and partly confirmed by CIT(A). Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>