<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 122 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764060</link>
    <description>Proceedings challenging action under the KGST Act were not interdicted because the petitioner had already been given an opportunity to hear and answer the discrepancies set out in the communication dated 12.11.2024. The petitioner may respond to those discrepancies and raise all contentions available in law, including objections based on non-compliance with Section 67(1) of the KGST Act. The petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 122 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764060</link>
      <description>Proceedings challenging action under the KGST Act were not interdicted because the petitioner had already been given an opportunity to hear and answer the discrepancies set out in the communication dated 12.11.2024. The petitioner may respond to those discrepancies and raise all contentions available in law, including objections based on non-compliance with Section 67(1) of the KGST Act. The petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>